Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 _____________________ January 11, 2000 _____________________ GSBCA 15073-RELO In the Matter of MICHAEL R. PLANITZ Michael R. Planitz, Ardmore, AL, Claimant. Col. G.L. Hill, Commanding, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, St. Louis Operating Location, St. Louis, MO, appearing for Department of Defense. PARKER, Board Judge. Michael R. Planitz, an employee of the Department of the Army who was transferred to Huntsville, Alabama, asks the Board to review the Army s calculation of his Relocation Income Tax (RIT) allowance. The RIT allowance is intended to reimburse transferred employees for substantially all of the additional tax liability incurred as a result of moving expense reimbursements. According to Mr. Planitz, although his 1998 earned income of $58,421 put him in the 28 percent Federal income tax bracket, he was reimbursed at a rate of 15 percent because the marginal tax rate table used for calculating the RIT allowance does not reach the 28 percent rate until a gross income of $61,069 is achieved. Mr. Planitz believes that the RIT allowance tax rate table is in error and that he should have been reimbursed based on the higher rate. As discussed below, we find no error in the tax rate table and thus deny Mr. Planitz s claim. The marginal tax rate table, which is published as part of the Federal Travel Regulation, establishes the gross earned income levels at which various tax rates apply for purposes of calculating the RIT allowance. 41 CFR 302-11, App. A (1998). The table necessarily does not match the Federal income tax tables because the amounts listed in the marginal tax rate table are gross earned income amounts, not taxable income amounts. Federal income taxes are paid based on taxable income, which takes into account such things as deductions, exemptions, and credits. The income levels in the marginal tax rate table, which result from extensive research by the Department of the Treasury, are based on average amounts of taxable income at various gross income levels. For 1998, Treasury s research determined that an 2 average married taxpayer filing a joint return would reach a taxable income which would put him in the 28 percent tax bracket when his gross earned income reached $61,069. Mr. Planitz s reimbursement did not match exactly his additional tax liability because he did not have exactly the same deductions, exemptions, and credits as the average taxpayer. As we explained recently in Herman S. Ransom, GSBCA 15151- RELO (Dec. 28, 1999), the statute and the regulations are designed to reimburse employees for substantially all of the taxes they incur as a result of reimbursed relocation expenses. The procedures contained in the regulations for calculating the amount of an allowance are not designed to reimburse an employee for the exact amount of the employee's tax liability and cannot be adjusted to take into account an individual employee's particular circumstances. 41 CFR 302-11.8(b); accord Sol Gilman, GSBCA 14938-RELO, 99-2 BCA 30, 506; William A. Lewis, GSBCA 14367-RELO, 98-1 BCA 29,532. Thus, even though Mr. Planitz's circumstances caused him to incur a tax liability that was not fully satisfied by the allowance he received, the Army cannot pay him an allowance in excess of that permitted by the regulations. __________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge